{
  "id": 2476824,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. John G. McHatton, Sheriff of Schuyler County",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Duncan v. McHatton",
  "decision_date": "1840-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "566",
  "last_page": "566",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Scam. 566"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. 566"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 89,
    "char_count": 903,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.754,
    "sha256": "0172449c34f55437bd9c8e6ecab272b540f9a044058c1c7754e87bc78dafca91",
    "simhash": "1:3e60de9ae14ef4be",
    "word_count": 155
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:58:58.619010+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. John G. McHatton, Sheriff of Schuyler County."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam:\nThe rule should have been served by copy. The return is insufficient. The motion must be denied.\nMotion denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Y. Scammon, for the relator, moved that an attachment issue against the defendant.",
      "M. McConnel objected."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. John G. McHatton, Sheriff of Schuyler County.\nMotion for Attachment.\nAn order or rule uptin an officer to return process should be served by copy.\nIn this case the relator produced the order of the Court requiring the defendant to return certain fee bills and executions for costs, which, it appeared by affidavit, had been committed to him for collection, and which he had failed to return. The return to the copy of the rule, was as follows :\n\u201c Served this rule, by reading, on John G. McHatton, the 23d day of January, 1841.\n\u201c Samuel Mason, Coroner of Schuyler County.\u201d\nJ. Y. Scammon, for the relator, moved that an attachment issue against the defendant.\nM. McConnel objected."
  },
  "file_name": "0566-01",
  "first_page_order": 584,
  "last_page_order": 584
}