{
  "id": 2477494,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. Moses Hallett, late Sheriff of Jo Daviess County",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Duncan v. Hallett",
  "decision_date": "1840-12",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "566",
  "last_page": "567",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "2 Scam. 566"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "3 Ill. 566"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 104,
    "char_count": 1178,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.706,
    "sha256": "59a9c847ba0041f93e9259cd4ac5d4eadd4e28f86e3815a3a2af5956b8998853",
    "simhash": "1:18f3a9003fbae93b",
    "word_count": 199
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:58:58.619010+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. Moses Hallett, late Sheriff of Jo Daviess County."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per curiam:\nThe proceedings seem to be regular. Let the attachment issue. Attachment awarded.\nNote. See The People v. Needles, Ante 361.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Young Scammon, for the relator."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, ex relatione James M. Duncan, Clerk of the Supreme Court, v. Moses Hallett, late Sheriff of Jo Daviess County.\nMotion for Attachment.\nWhere a rule to show cause why an attachment should not issue against an officer, for neglecting to return process, was served twenty days before the return day, by leaving a copy of the rule with the officer, and he acknowledged the service, and no cause was shown, an attachment was awarded against him.\nMarch 1, 1841. On this day, the relator produced the order of this Court, requiring the defendant to show cause why an attachment should not issue against him, for neglecting to return certain fee bills and executions for costs, heretofore committed to him for collection; and a copy of the order with the following return endorsed thereon:\n\u201c Served the within upon Mo ses Hallett, this 5th day of February, 1841, by his acknowledging service, and leaving him a copy of the within.\n\u201c Alexander Young, Sheriff Jo Daviess County.\u201d\nJ. Young Scammon, for the relator."
  },
  "file_name": "0566-02",
  "first_page_order": 584,
  "last_page_order": 585
}