{
  "id": 2426885,
  "name": "The People ex rel. C. W. Frazier, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Frazier v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1921-12-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 14187",
  "first_page": "556",
  "last_page": "556",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "300 Ill. 556"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "296 Ill. 483",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5057346
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/296/0483-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "296 Ill. 483",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5057346
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/296/0483-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 1006,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.734,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6013132425867299
    },
    "sha256": "173718d3224b1d8c84e43f28de19b95b4d2596a817e49c7ffd8c240947b5572c",
    "simhash": "1:3fc686c4402eaf13",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:26:06.170820+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. C. W. Frazier, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe question presented in this case is the identical question presented in the objection to the school tax in People v. Payne, 296 Ill. 483. Appellant contends that the decision rendered in that case was due to a misconception of the provisions of the statutes involved and urges that the decision be overruled. We have considered its argument on the question and adhere to the former decision.\nThe judgment of the county court of White county is therefore affirmed. ,\n, Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. J. Kolb, and J. A. Pearce, (L. J. Hackney, and H. N. Quigley, of counsel,) for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 14187.\nJudgment affirmed.)\nThe People ex rel. C. W. Frazier, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company, Appellant.\nOpinion filed December 22, 1921.\nThis case is controlled by the decision in People v. Payne, 296 Ill. 483.\nAppeal from the County Court of White county; the Hon. Ulys Pyle, Judge, presiding.\nP. J. Kolb, and J. A. Pearce, (L. J. Hackney, and H. N. Quigley, of counsel,) for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0556-01",
  "first_page_order": 556,
  "last_page_order": 556
}