{
  "id": 5007150,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Frank Dillon, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Dillon",
  "decision_date": "1922-06-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 14677",
  "first_page": "539",
  "last_page": "539",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "303 Ill. 539"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "291 Ill. 614",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2422142
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/291/0614-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "291 Ill. 614",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2422142
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/291/0614-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 111,
    "char_count": 1271,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.726,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15479589736698934
    },
    "sha256": "f6d65b91098e183254575849383842a641a68f7ce3ad1ff6fcdf1e17a7570e5f",
    "simhash": "1:9182d5c3c0de12b5",
    "word_count": 206
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:48:38.499829+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Frank Dillon, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nPlaintiff in error pleaded guilty to an indictment charging robbery and was sentenced to the penitentiary in accordance with the provisions of the Parole law. His sole contention in this court is that the Parole law contravenes certain provisions of the State and Federal constitutions. This contention has been answered in earlier decisions, (People v. Connors, 291 Ill. 614; People v. Simmons, 299 id. 201;) and so the judgment of the criminal court is accordingly affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William L. Sullivan, and Charles P. R. Macaulay, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General, Robert E. Crowe, State\u2019s Attorney, and Edward C. Fitch, (Edward E. Wilson, Clyde C. Fisher, and Alva L. Bates, of counsel,) for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "No. 14677.\nJudgment affirmed.\nThe People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Frank Dillon, Plaintiff in Error.\nOpinion filed June 21, 1922.\nCriminal law\u2014the Parole law is valid. The Parole law does not violate the provisions of either the State or Federal constitution. (People v. Connors, 291 Ill. 614, and People v. Simmons, 299 id. 201, followed.)\nWrit of Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Kickham Scanlan, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam L. Sullivan, and Charles P. R. Macaulay, for plaintiff in error.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General, Robert E. Crowe, State\u2019s Attorney, and Edward C. Fitch, (Edward E. Wilson, Clyde C. Fisher, and Alva L. Bates, of counsel,) for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0539-01",
  "first_page_order": 539,
  "last_page_order": 539
}