{
  "id": 2436450,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Phosa Williams, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Wabash Railway Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Williams v. Wabash Railway Co.",
  "decision_date": "1924-12-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 16373",
  "first_page": "91",
  "last_page": "92",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "315 Ill. 91"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "314 Ill. 339",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5132816
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/314/0339-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "314 Ill. 455",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5129721
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/314/0455-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "306 Ill. 402",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5782771
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/306/0402-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "314 Ill. 339",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5132816
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/314/0339-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 159,
    "char_count": 2323,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.749,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08085838209100221
    },
    "sha256": "abfbf8d78953ef78c056698a9bd3c6b5141a93bc392b5682b92d445ddc215c99",
    "simhash": "1:cbcbcc4b0ea6ca63",
    "word_count": 386
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:49.130380+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Phosa Williams, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Wabash Railway Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Farmer\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe Wabash Railway Company, appellant, objected to judgment against its property for certain road and bridge taxes in the towns of Kinderhook, Levee, Flint, Griggsville, Hadley and Chambersburg, in Pike county. The court overruled the objections, rendered judgment for the tax, and the railway company has appealed.\nThe objections to all the taxes are the same, viz., that the written consent of the board of town auditors for a levy in addition to fifty cents on the $100 was not given or obtained at a meeting held prior to the first Tuesday in September, 1923, but the consent of the auditors for the additional levy was given on the first Tuesday in September. Appellant concedes the county court followed the decision in People v. Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railway Co. 306 Ill. 402, but insists that is not controlling in view of the legislation of 1923 amending the Township Organization act. The same contention was made in People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 314 Ill. 339, but was not sustained. The previous decision was adhered to, that the consent of the board of town auditors may be given for the additional levy on the first Tuesday in September notwithstanding the amendment to the Township Organization act of 1923. The same ruling was made in People v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Co. 314 Ill. 455, and other cases decided at the present term.\nThe judgment is affirmed. J 0\nT , , m , Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Farmer"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Williams , & Williams, (Nat S. Brown, and Louis H. StrassER, of counsel,) for appellant.",
      "Barry Mumeord, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 16373.\nJudgment affirmed.)\nThe People ex rel. Phosa Williams, County Collector, Appellee, vs. The Wabash Railway Company, Appellant.\nOpinion filed December 16, 1924.\nTaxes \u2014 when consent to additional town road and bridge tax may be obtained. Consent to the levy of an additional town road and bridge tax is sufficient if obtained on the first Tuesday in September and prior to the levy of the tax and is not required to be given at a previous meeting authorized by the amendment of 1923 to the Township Organization act. (People v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 314 Ill. 339, followed.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Pike county; the Hon. Mark Bradburn, Judge, presiding.\nWilliams , & Williams, (Nat S. Brown, and Louis H. StrassER, of counsel,) for appellant.\nBarry Mumeord, State\u2019s Attorney, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0091-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 92
}