{
  "id": 2443673,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. H. E. Puckett, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Puckett",
  "decision_date": "1927-02-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 17703",
  "first_page": "293",
  "last_page": "293",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "324 Ill. 293"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 116,
    "char_count": 1282,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.702,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.10367110313258e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5061324038582944
    },
    "sha256": "c8c535b524ff0f099b28006ce43462ec1304e71cb354a723398b4e2f9b3209e1",
    "simhash": "1:02906cb78acf6ab5",
    "word_count": 211
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:39:01.741508+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. H. E. Puckett, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nPlaintiff in error, H. E. Puckett, was convicted in the county court of Hancock county of violating the Medical Practice act. He prosecutes this writ of error to reverse the judgment on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional and that the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to his plea of former conviction.\nThe questions in this case are the same as those in People v. Hawkinson, (ante, p. 285,) and for the reasons given in the opinion filed in that case we find them without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas Morris, Clyde P. Johnson, O. C. Kirkpatrick, and L. Lament, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, Homer H. Williams, State\u2019s Attorney, and Merrill F. Wehmhoff, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 17703.\nJudgment affirmed.)\nThe People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. H. E. Puckett, Plaintiff in Error.\nOpinion filed February 16, 1927.\nMedicine and surgery \u2014 Medical Practice act of 192s is valid\u2014 former jeopardy. The Medical Practice act of 1923 does not delegate legislative or judicial power to the Department of Registration and Education. (People v. Hawkinson, ante, p. 285, followed.)\nWrit oe Error to the County Court of Hancock county; the Hon. Warren H. Orr, Judge, presiding.\nThomas Morris, Clyde P. Johnson, O. C. Kirkpatrick, and L. Lament, for plaintiff in error.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, Homer H. Williams, State\u2019s Attorney, and Merrill F. Wehmhoff, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0293-01",
  "first_page_order": 293,
  "last_page_order": 293
}