{
  "id": 5211159,
  "name": "Vanmeter's Heirs v. Love's Heirs",
  "name_abbreviation": "Vanmeter's Heirs v. Love's Heirs",
  "decision_date": "1864-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "260",
  "last_page": "262",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "33 Ill. 260"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 248,
    "char_count": 4483,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.578,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.970317677716221e-07,
      "percentile": 0.739226495444329
    },
    "sha256": "97e8a8ba1224381b481db7cafdfe1d7063f6adc9d564a633e48d217f3603a731",
    "simhash": "1:b8d5044f78caae36",
    "word_count": 772
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:24:06.322616+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Vanmeter\u2019s Heirs v. Love\u2019s Heirs."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Bbeese\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThe decree in this case, instead of being several against the defendants should have been joint for the whole debt proved to be due the heirs of Vanmeter. The liability of Love\u2019s heirs for the debts of their ancestor, both in law and in equity, is to the extent of the full amount which came to them by descent. The decree should have been against them jointly for the whole amount, otherwise, if any one of the heirs be insolvent, the heirs of Vanmeter would lose the amount decreed against such insolvent. Cogwell's Heirs v. Lyon, 3 J. J. Marshall, 39.\nThe data being before us by which a proper decree can be entered, we will direct that the decree of the Circuit Court be reversed, and the following decree entered in the cause. This court being satisfied in the premises, considers and adjudges that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs as follows: To Etna J. Vanmeter, Isaac J. Vanmeter, and Martha J. Vanmeter, the sum of one hundred and thirty-eight TW dollars; to Isaac Vanmeter, one hundred and three dollars; to Amasa Van-meter, sixty-nine dollars; and to John Vanmeter, thirty-nine T9/o dollars; amounting in all to the sum of three hundred and fifty-one TVo dollars. It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court, that the said plaintiffs have and recover from the said defendants, heirs-at-law of John Love, the said sum of money with six per cent, per annum interest thereon from the 27th of November, 1861, as also their costs, both in this court and in the court below, provided, however, that neither of the said defendants, heirs-at-law as aforesaid, be subjected to \u00e1 greater liability in this case than to the extent of nine hundred and ninety-eight dollars.\nDecree reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Bbeese"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. D. A. and T. W. Smith, for the plaintiffs in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Vanmeter\u2019s Heirs v. Love\u2019s Heirs.\n1. Heirs\u2014decree\u2014should be against them jointly, not severally, where several defendants in chancery are found to be liable as heirs for the debt of their ancestor, the decree should not be against them severally, but jointly for the whole amount.\n2. Heirs\u2014extent of their liability for debts of ancestor. The liability of heirs for the debts of their ancestor, both at law and in equity, is to the extent of the full amount which came to them by descent.\n3. But it seems, an heir should not be made liable beyond the amount he has thus received. So, in entering a decree in the Supreme Court against several heirs, for the debt of their ancestor, the court directed that neither of them should be subjected to a greater liability than to the extent of the amount which came to him by descent.\nWrit of Error to the Circuit Court of Greene county; the Hon. D. M. Woodson, Judge, presiding.\nThis is a suit in chancery, instituted in the Circuit Court by the heirs-at-law of Joseph Vanmeter, deceased, against the administrator and heirs of John Love, deceased.\nIt appears from the record, that John Love, in his lifetime, was guardian of the heirs of Vanmeter, and in that capacity received large sums of money, belonging to his wards, which he never-accounted for. The object of the suit was to compel the heirs of Love to render an account of the moneys received by Him as such guardian, and to pay the same over to the complainants. '\n\u00ab\u25a0 It is alleged\" that the defendants, children and heirs of Love, received of the personal estate of their father, the sum of five thousand dollars, an amount exceeding that claimed by the complainants, and which is still in their hands.\nThe court below, upon a hearing of the cause, found to be due to the complainants, in certain specified proportions, the sum of $212.59; that there had been distributed among the heirs-at-law of Love, five in number, of the personal estate of their father, the sum of $700 each; and the court decreed that the complainants, \u201c according to the aforesaid interests and proportions, have, recover and receive the aforesaid sums of money, with six per cent, interest thereon from,\u201d &c., \u201cas also their costs in this case, and from the. above named defendants, individually and severally, as follows, to wit,\u201d each one-fifth, \u201c and that complainants accordingly have several executions, as aforesaid, against said defendants.\u201d\nThe complainants bring the cause to this court upon writ of error, and insist the decree is erroneous because it is several against the defendants, whereas it should have been against them jointly for the whole amount.\nMessrs. D. A. and T. W. Smith, for the plaintiffs in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0260-01",
  "first_page_order": 260,
  "last_page_order": 262
}