{
  "id": 5292723,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Charles Stahulak, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Stahulak",
  "decision_date": "1933-10-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 22015",
  "first_page": "348",
  "last_page": "349",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "353 Ill. 348"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1819,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.754,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.3075874670173528e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7880870660799143
    },
    "sha256": "7dc84b61426b27bc9c0fbdc392a463cea8c36c58e510f7138b756f980c750421",
    "simhash": "1:83e2e92e5aa81099",
    "word_count": 311
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:28.719288+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Charles Stahulak, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Shaw\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nOn August 6, 1929, plaintiff in error, Charles Stahulak, was indicted jointly with one Stanley Pickacz upon a charge of assault with intent to commit robbery, the indictment being returned into open court in the criminal court of Cook county. He was thereafter duly arraigned and upon his plea of not guilty was tried and convicted before the court and a jury. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment having been made and overruled, he was committed to the reformatory at Pontiac, Illinois, upon the final judgment of the court. The case is here on writ of error to the criminal court of Cook county.\nPlaintiff in error urges three reasons for reversal, viz.: (1) That the defendant was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) that there was no proof that the plaintiff in error aided or assisted in the attempted robbery; and (3) that the trial court erred in giving and refusing instructions.\nThe record brought to this court is the common law record, only, there being no bill of exceptions. No complaint is made as to the sufficiency of the indictment nor anything else shown by the common law record. It is obvious that this court cannot consider either of the three points urged by the plaintiff in error, without a bill of exceptions, (People v. Hoffman, 344 111. 533,) and it is therefore necessary that the judgment of the criminal court of Cook county be affirmed.\nT , , rr , Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Shaw"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John J. Byrne, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General, Thomas J. Courtney, State\u2019s Attorney, and J. J. Neiger, (Edward E. Wilson, and Grenville Beardsley, of counsel,) for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 22015.\nThe People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Charles Stahulak, Plaintiff in Error.\nOpinion filed October 21, 1933.\nJohn J. Byrne, for plaintiff in error.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General, Thomas J. Courtney, State\u2019s Attorney, and J. J. Neiger, (Edward E. Wilson, and Grenville Beardsley, of counsel,) for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0348-01",
  "first_page_order": 348,
  "last_page_order": 349
}