{
  "id": 5216611,
  "name": "George C. Lemon et al. v. Heman Baldwin",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lemon v. Baldwin",
  "decision_date": "1864-04",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "53",
  "last_page": "53",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "36 Ill. 53"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 63,
    "char_count": 532,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "62ab8ab9f711a463a33e87c3f1d83e2cec3294dbe9b68b39b6e759ed8924843f",
    "simhash": "1:0281e6380845aa34",
    "word_count": 88
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:55.334834+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George C. Lemon et al. v. Heman Baldwin"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Walker :\nThis record presents the same questions which were discussed and determined at the present term, in the case of Lemon v. Stevenson. It is therefore unnecessary to again discuss them in this case. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Walker :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Leland & Blanchard, for the Appellants.",
      "Mr. A. E. Stevenson, and Mr. T. M. Shaw, for the Appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George C. Lemon et al. v. Heman Baldwin\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of LaSalle county; the Hon. Madison E. Hollister, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Leland & Blanchard, for the Appellants.\nMr. A. E. Stevenson, and Mr. T. M. Shaw, for the Appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0053-01",
  "first_page_order": 53,
  "last_page_order": 53
}