{
  "id": 5214347,
  "name": "Charles L. Smith et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Smith v. People",
  "decision_date": "1865-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "290",
  "last_page": "292",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "36 Ill. 290"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 250,
    "char_count": 5335,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.497,
    "sha256": "abefe18425312acc554c1cc002a1832020458601d86081825ed887859959b2cf",
    "simhash": "1:895180ece8f5c590",
    "word_count": 939
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:55.334834+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles L. Smith et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Breese\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis record shows that an indictment for a riot was found by the grand jury of Coles county, at the October term, 1861, of the Circuit Court of that county, against seven . persons named therein. Five of the defendants obtained a change of venue to Edgar county. The indictment, certified to the Edgar Circuit Court, from the Coles Circuit Court, was against six persons only, the name of one of the seven being omitted.\nOn this indictment, the defendants, who had obtained a change of venue, went to trial in Edgar county, and were convicted. A motion for a new trial was entered and overruled, whereupon, a motion in arrest of judgment was made, which was also overruled, and a fine imposed on each of the defendants.\nThe case is brought here by writ of error, and these rulings of the court assigned as error.\nUpon the first point, as the evidence is not preserved, we cannot say a new trial should have been granted, or that any injustice has been done by the verdict.\nQn the other point, it appears the defendants were tried on an indictment which had not been found by the grand jury. The one found, and presented by the grand jury to the Coles Circuit Court, was against seven persons ; the one on which the defendants were tried, was against six of those persons, and if for the same offense, a recovery or judgment in the one case could not be pleaded in bar of a judgment in the other.\nFor this reason the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded. It was the duty of the State\u2019s attorney, on perceiving the defect in the indictment certified to the Edgar Circuit Court, to have alleged a diminution of the record, and thus have obtained a full and correct copy from Coles county.\nThe judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Breese"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Allison & Moulton, for the Plaintiffs in Error.",
      "Mr. J. B. White, State\u2019s Attorney, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles L. Smith et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois.\nVenue \u2014 change of am, vtididmeni. An indictment certified from one county to another on a change of venue, must contain the names of all the persons indicted. So, where an indictment was found against seven persons for a riot, and the one certified, contained the names of six only, Held, no judgment could be rendered against the six convicted; Held, also, that the State\u2019s attorney should, on the change of venue, have applied to the court for a stay of proceedings until a correct copy of the indictment could be had.\nError to the Circuit Court of Edgar county; the Hon. O. H. Constable, Judge, presiding.\nThis was a proceeding by indictment at the October term, 1861, of the Circuit Court of Coles county, against Charles E. Smith, Thomas P. James, and five others, for a misdemeanor.\nAt the May term, 1862, of said court, five of the defendants in the indictment, viz., Smith, Sanders, Jones, Barker and Trimble, filed an affidavit for a change of venue in the cause, and a change was granted by the court to Edgar county, as to the said five defendants, and continued as to the other two defendants, Thomas P. James and Peter J. Drake.\nThe copy of the indictment transmitted by the court of Coles county to the Circuit Court of Edgar county, purports to be a, copy of an indictment against Charles L. Smith, Azariah Sanders, Peter J. Drake, \u25a0 Philander Jones, Sylvester D. Barker, and Warner Trimble, six persons only.\nThe clerk of Coles county certified that the copy transmitted by him, was the copy of an indictment against six persons, not including Thomas P. James.\nThe plaintiffs in error were tried on this record, purporting to be a copy of an indictment, and the jury returned a verdict of \u201c guilty \u201d against them. Whereupon, said defendants below moved the court for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment. Defendants below, among others, filed the following reasons for a new trial:\nBecause the paper purporting to be a copy of the original indictment, is not a true copy, in this: that it does not contain the name of Thomas P. James, one of the defendants named in the original indictment.\nBecause there is no record or papers on file in the clerk\u2019s office of Edgar county, upon which this court can render judgment or sentence in the cause. Because the cause in which the defendants, impleaded as above, took a change of venue from Coles county to Edgar county, was an indictment in which they were impleaded with one Thomas P. James, and no other indictment.\nBecause defendants, impleaded as above, have been tried without any indictment whatever.\nThe court overruled the motion for a new trial. Also, the court overruled the motion in arrest of judgment. To all of which, defendants then and there excepted, and bill of exceptions signed by the court.\nAfterwards the court rendered judgment upon said verdict, against all of the plaintiffs in error, and imposed a fine on each of them.\nThe defendants below bring the cause here by writ of error, and assign the following as errors :\n1. The court erred in overruling defendants\u2019 motion for a new trial.\n2. The court erred in overruling defendants\u2019 motion in arrest of judgment.\n3. The court erred in rendering judgment upon the verdict of the jury.\n4. The Circuit Court of Edgar county erred in taking jurisdiction of the cause\u2014the same not being properly in court.\nMessrs. Allison & Moulton, for the Plaintiffs in Error.\nMr. J. B. White, State\u2019s Attorney, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0290-01",
  "first_page_order": 290,
  "last_page_order": 292
}