{
  "id": 2591923,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Przybysh",
  "decision_date": "1936-02-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 23058",
  "first_page": "526",
  "last_page": "527",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "362 Ill. 526"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "357 Ill. 407",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5281023
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/357/0407-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 114,
    "char_count": 1326,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.71,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08245731700960172
    },
    "sha256": "d9775e1ff1ed5656c8d4b9b96dd5575c8cf516402f0f38f362962e6c04b4b93f",
    "simhash": "1:8b33a0b3c7b648bc",
    "word_count": 222
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:35:08.987733+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Herrick\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nStanislaus Przybysh, the defendant, was, on a trial without a jury in the criminal court of Cook county, found guilty of embezzlement and sentenced to the penitentiary. He brings the case here by writ of error.\nThe defendant contends that the evidence does not support the judgment and that the alleged crime was barfed by the Statute of Limitations. On the motion of the People made in this court the purported bill of exceptions was stricken from the transcript of the record.\nBefore this court can review the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment of conviction or whether the prosecution for the alleged offense was in fact barred by the Statute of Limitations, the evidence must all be included in a bill of exceptions. (People v. Buckman, 357 Ill. 407.) The facts on which the questions are argued here have not been properly preserved, and we are without jurisdiction to review the evidence.\nThe judgment of the criminal court of Cook county is therefore affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Herrick"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. E. Gettys, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Otto Kerner, Attorney General, and A. B. Dennis, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 23058.\nThe People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Stanislaus Przybysh, Plaintiff in Error.\nOpinion filed February 14, 1936.\nA. E. Gettys, for plaintiff in error.\nOtto Kerner, Attorney General, and A. B. Dennis, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0526-01",
  "first_page_order": 526,
  "last_page_order": 527
}