{
  "id": 2466749,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Roosevelt Washington, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Washington",
  "decision_date": "1947-01-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 29779",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "31",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "396 Ill. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "385 Ill. 289",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5305429
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/385/0289-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "387 Ill. 72",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2496518
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/387/0072-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "388 Ill. 212",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2501228
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/388/0212-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "391 Ill. 523",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2512979
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/391/0523-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "394 Ill. 194",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2471406
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/394/0194-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "374 Ill. 437",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2531626
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/374/0437-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "392 Ill. 452",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2514605
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/392/0452-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 196,
    "char_count": 2496,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.759,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.194431998719562e-08,
      "percentile": 0.43035694359014753
    },
    "sha256": "69679c03f5c66406e1d6af5a7e49351e021f3d237c24c17f5cd60c5c9babae27",
    "simhash": "1:c66bd44266156e91",
    "word_count": 416
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:55:59.150170+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Roosevelt Washington, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Wilson\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe defendant; Roosevelt Washington, was indicted in the circuit court of St. Clair county for the murder of Ulysses Rozier. A jury found him guilty and fixed his punishment at 199 years\u2019 imprisonment in the penitentiary. February 21, 1938, judgment was rendered on the verdict. Defendant prosecutes this writ of error, appearing pro se. No bill of exceptions has been filed, and the assignments of error must be considered solely upon the common-law record.\nDefendant contends that the common-law record, as certified to by the clerk and trial judge, fails to show the convening order of the court. Recourse to the record affirmatively discloses the convening of the court. Defendant\u2019s second contention is that the record fails to show the indictment was returned into open court, as required by law. Again, the record affirmatively shows that the indictment was returned in open court. Indeed, defendant, in his brief, admits \u201cA True Bill was returned into open Court on the 17th day of January- A.D. 1938. No Bail.\u201d Defendant\u2019s first two assignments of error represent attempts to controvert matters affirmatively appearing from the record. The record imports verity and cannot be contradicted except by oth\u00e9r matters of record by or under the authority of the court. People ex rel. Cohen v. Ragen, 392 Ill. 452; People v. DeLisle, 374 Ill. 437.\nBy his six remaining assignments of error, defendant charges errors in the admission and exclusion of evidence; insists that the trial judge erred in directing the bailiff to take out of the court room, and to jail, in the presence of the jury, one of his witnesses; urges that the verdict was the result of passion and prejudice and, also, that it is contrary to the evidence and to the law. No one of these contentions finds a basis in the common-law record. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, the six alleged errors are not open to consideration. People v. Foster, 394 Ill. 194; People v. Richardson, 391 Ill. 523; People v. Johns, 388 Ill. 212; People v. Lants, 387 Ill. 72; People v. Bertrand, 385 Ill. 289.\nThe judgment of the circuit court of St. Clair county\nis affirmed.\n, Judgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Wilson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Roosevelt Washington, pro se.",
      "George F. Barrett, Attorney General, and Louis P. Zerweck, State\u2019s Attorney, of Belleville, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 29779.\nThe People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, vs. Roosevelt Washington, Plaintiff in Error.\nOpinion filed January 22, 1947.\nRoosevelt Washington, pro se.\nGeorge F. Barrett, Attorney General, and Louis P. Zerweck, State\u2019s Attorney, of Belleville, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 30,
  "last_page_order": 31
}