{
  "id": 425883,
  "name": "Casey v. Horton, Jr.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Casey v. Horton",
  "decision_date": "1864-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "54",
  "last_page": "54",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "40 Ill. 54"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 68,
    "char_count": 738,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.494,
    "sha256": "9a506a50d08ac9c4e1b7501e119c498eebfaed49e0a760c977736c39df191adc",
    "simhash": "1:f5a3789b728d232d",
    "word_count": 125
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:40:50.333701+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Casey v. Horton, Jr."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThere being an issue formed by the joinder in error, and objection being made, the application for leave to assign additional errors will not be entertained, except it be in writing.\nBut Hr. Haynie, to save time, waived his objection, and leave to assign the additional errors was granted.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Linegar,",
      "Hr. Haynie,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Casey v. Horton, Jr.\n(November Term, 1864.)\nMotions\u2014when they must be in writing. After a joinder in error, if objection be made, a motion for leave to assign additional errors will not be entertained, except it be in writing.\nMr. Linegar,\nfor the plaintiff in error, asked leave to assign additional errors upon the record.\nHr. Haynie,\nfor the defendant, objected, saying that he had joined in error upon the errors already assigned."
  },
  "file_name": "0054-02",
  "first_page_order": 54,
  "last_page_order": 54
}