{
  "id": 425917,
  "name": "Gillespie v. Rout",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gillespie v. Rout",
  "decision_date": "1866-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "58",
  "last_page": "58",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "40 Ill. 58"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 767,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.472,
    "sha256": "520b0dac95198e433ab8fd7762cd4bed073ddfa55fe6a919a004c4524817de4c",
    "simhash": "1:dd392f4724069bc0",
    "word_count": 125
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:40:50.333701+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Gillespie v. Rout."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nWe cannot dispense with a printed brief of the points and authorities relied upon. Even a printed argument will not meet the rule in that regard, unless the counsel shall set down in the argument a clear, distinct statement of the points designed to be elaborated in the argument, with the authorities in support thereof immediately following.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. McClure,"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Gillespie v. Rout.\n(January Term, 1866.)\nPrinted briefs must he filed, even though there he a printed argument, unless the points are clearly and separately set down in the argument, with the authorities in support thereof immediately following.\nMr. McClure,\non behalf of the defendant in error, said he desired to submit this case for decision upon written or printed argument, without filing a printed brief."
  },
  "file_name": "0058-02",
  "first_page_order": 58,
  "last_page_order": 58
}