{
  "id": 5310311,
  "name": "Norton Company, Appellant, vs. The Department of Revenue, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue",
  "decision_date": "1951-05-21",
  "docket_number": "No. 31196",
  "first_page": "216",
  "last_page": "216",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "409 Ill. 216"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "405 Ill. 314",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2627178
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/405/0314-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 93,
    "char_count": 932,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.814,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15768428970183204
    },
    "sha256": "7c6151b66a4c4f9031acf924f5aac5c82f040e5acb1e4446925584b749e701d8",
    "simhash": "1:1daba4760aeaefa4",
    "word_count": 153
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:04:21.348874+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Norton Company, Appellant, vs. The Department of Revenue, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Daily\ndelivered the announcement of the court:\nPursuant to the order entered by the United States Supreme Court in the cause of Norton Company v. The Department of Revenue of Illinois, (No. 133, October Term, 1950, of said court), our opinion in the same cause, reported at 405 Ill. 314, is modified to hold that the company is not liable under the Retailers\u2019 Occupation Tax Act, for income derived from orders sent directly to Worcester, Massachusetts, by the Illinois customer and shipped directly to the customer from Worcester. Our decision is reaffirmed in all other respects and the cause remanded to the circuit court of Sangamon county for a determination of the amount of credit to which Norton Company is entitled by virtue of direct sales in the nature of those described above.\nRemanded with directions.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Daily"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 31196.\nNorton Company, Appellant, vs. The Department of Revenue, Appellee.\nAnnounced May 21, 1951."
  },
  "file_name": "0216-01",
  "first_page_order": 216,
  "last_page_order": 216
}