{
  "id": 425046,
  "name": "Benjamin F. Freeman v. Marion R. Dunn et ux.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Freeman v. Dunn",
  "decision_date": "1867-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "61",
  "last_page": "62",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "45 Ill. 61"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 70,
    "char_count": 625,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "1de094223e20b316f3b68f68fba88d493c7c6feeeb8d02ea66687fc2bb640b8e",
    "simhash": "1:9aed5260190cdfa3",
    "word_count": 108
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:07:46.340796+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin F. Freeman v. Marion R. Dunn et ux."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Lawrence\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis case is, in all its essential features, the same as the case of Freeman v. Hartman, ante, the two cases having been submitted together on the same argument. The same order must be entered in this case as in that.\nDecree affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Lawrence"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Frost & Tunnicliff, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Lanphere & Price, for the appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin F. Freeman v. Marion R. Dunn et ux.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; the Hon. John S. Thompson, Judge, presiding.\nThe facts in this case are the same as those stated in the opinion delivered in the next preceding case.\nMessrs. Frost & Tunnicliff, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Lanphere & Price, for the appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0061-01",
  "first_page_order": 61,
  "last_page_order": 62
}