{
  "id": 5299967,
  "name": "James Gallagher et al. v. David R. Brandt et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gallagher v. Brandt",
  "decision_date": "1869-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "80",
  "last_page": "81",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "52 Ill. 80"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 100,
    "char_count": 1057,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.863395341357708e-08,
      "percentile": 0.4989140293507459
    },
    "sha256": "a7d5d1258c060f1c89a4e6571d6aa50b9051ecf693a1754b3e67621c0f230ef5",
    "simhash": "1:d1e369ef79224248",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:11:47.107839+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Gallagher et al. v. David R. Brandt et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Lawrence\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis was an action of trespass, in which the plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment for one hundred dollars, and the defendants appealed. It is urged by appellees\u2019 counsel that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. That question, however, is not before us, for the bill of exceptions does not purport to embody all the evidence. Eo objection is urged by counsel to the ruling of the court upon the instructions, and we discover no error in regard to them.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Lawrence"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. H. M. Chase, for the appellants.",
      "Mr. G. W. Brandt, for the appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Gallagher et al. v. David R. Brandt et al.\n1. Bill op exceptions\u2014its requisites. Where the error assigned is, that the verdict is against tjie evidence, but the bill of exceptions in the case does not purport to embody all the evidence,'this court will not regard such assignment of error as properly before it.\nAppeal to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Erastus S. Williams, Judge, presiding.\nThe opinion states the case.\nMr. H. M. Chase, for the appellants.\nMr. G. W. Brandt, for the appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0080-01",
  "first_page_order": 80,
  "last_page_order": 81
}