{
  "id": 5277050,
  "name": "John Burton et al. v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Burton v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1869-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "87",
  "last_page": "88",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "53 Ill. 87"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 2464,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.926517955990458e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8470372210889515
    },
    "sha256": "702fb2b889aaa5338c9e7860e923ea5939fa2d0ce13e1ece2fa1b99b7fa7413d",
    "simhash": "1:8bfb74bd0f2151ef",
    "word_count": 425
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:19.479696+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Burton et al. v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Lawrence\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis was an application for a judgment on' a special assessment in the city of Chicago. The charter provides that notice of filing the assessment roll in the clerk\u2019s office shall be given by six days\u2019 publication in a newspaper, and that a confirmation of such assessment will be applied for at the next regu- . lar meeting of the common council after the expiration of such publication. It is further provided, that objections to such assessment may be heard, but all objections shall be filed in writing in the office of the city clerk at least one day prior to the meeting of the council. In this case, publication for six days was made, commencing Monday, October 12, and ending Saturday, October 17, and the assessment was confirmed by the common council on Monday, October 19. It thus appears, Sunday being dies non juridieus, and the clerk\u2019s office not open for filing papers, no opportunity was given parties interested to file objections. As the law requires the objections to be filed at least one day prior to the meeting of the council, it must be construed as intending that a day shall intervene between the last publication and the action of the council. This right of objection before the council is a very important right, and must not be disregarded in these proceedings.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Lawrence"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hr. John Borden and Mr. John P. Wilson, for the appellants.",
      "Mr. S. A. Irvin, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John Burton et al. v. The City of Chicago.\n1. Special assessments\u2014time of fling objections to confirmation. \u2022 The clause of the charter of the city of Chicago which requires objections to a special assessment to be filed at least one day prior to the meeting of the common council at which the confirmation of the assessment will be applied for, is construed as intending that a day shall intervene between the last day of publication of notice of such application and the action of the council, and that day not a Sunday.\n2. So, where the last day of such publication was a Saturday, and the council confirmed the assessment on the following Monday, the intervening day being Sunday, which is dies non juridicus, it was held, the parties interested had no opportunity, such as the law contemplates, to file their objections, and a judgment on the assessment was reversed on that ground.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.\nThe opinion states the case.\nHr. John Borden and Mr. John P. Wilson, for the appellants.\nMr. S. A. Irvin, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0087-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 92
}