{
  "id": 5279524,
  "name": "James Griffith v. Hugh Sutherland",
  "name_abbreviation": "Griffith v. Sutherland",
  "decision_date": "1870-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "195",
  "last_page": "195",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "53 Ill. 195"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 78,
    "char_count": 759,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.567,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.1306339316831756e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3241766218802718
    },
    "sha256": "c1cf8b6b2b1159876f81ec8e2d43a228bd5d90ebeb30e8340cef0ef05b6c0151",
    "simhash": "1:b860f40ba2dd2590",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:54:19.479696+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James Griffith v. Hugh Sutherland."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nIn this case, the plaintiff in error has filed neither abstract nor brief. We have examined the assignment of errors and the record, and find the verdict clearly right upon the evidence.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Cullom, Zane & Marot, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Crook & Stuve, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James Griffith v. Hugh Sutherland.\nThe verdict in this case being clearly right, upon the evidence, the court refused to disturb it.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court \u00f3f Sangamon county; the Hon. Benjamin S. Edwards, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action of trespass, brought to recover damages for injury committed by the defendant\u2019s cattle, upon the premises of the plaintiff. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.\nMessrs. Cullom, Zane & Marot, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Crook & Stuve, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0195-01",
  "first_page_order": 199,
  "last_page_order": 199
}