{
  "id": 817786,
  "name": "P. F. W. Peck et al. and Azel Dorathy v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Peck v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1870-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "283",
  "last_page": "284",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "56 Ill. 283"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "55 Ill. 357",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5272013
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/55/0357-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 101,
    "char_count": 1029,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.02923915641413843
    },
    "sha256": "7611f4cd5a144846db5430f4ed03a9ae5ac7593d36dc050ae3f0e95e1da29bf4",
    "simhash": "1:90f6d5f849f57594",
    "word_count": 186
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:24:24.423395+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "P. F. W. Peck et al. and Azel Dorathy v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nAll the questions presented by the records in these cases, and discussed, are decided in the case of Dunham v. The City of Chicago, 55 Ill. 357, and must be disposed of in the same way.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "P. F. W. Peck et al. and Azel Dorathy v. The City of Chicago.\nAppeals from the Superior Court of Chicago.\nThese were suits in the cotirt below, for taxes, in which judgments were rendered against the several defendants, who thereupon took these appeals.\nThis and thirteen other cases against the city of Chicago, all involving the same questions, were considered together. The parties appealing in the other cases were as follows: Charles Follansbee; Cornelia W. Storey et al.; Potter Palmer et al.; Azel Dorathy; S. J. McCormick et al. and Martin O. Walker; John C. Haines et al.; William Wheeler et al. and Edgar Loomis et al.; Moses Grey and W. H. Adams; N. B. Smith et al. and A. D. Rich; R. McClelland et al. and Martin O. Walker; L. C. P. Freer and Azel Dorathy; Martin O. Walker et al.; Martin O. Walker."
  },
  "file_name": "0283-01",
  "first_page_order": 285,
  "last_page_order": 286
}