{
  "id": 8502426,
  "name": "Nathan G. Harding et al. v. John W. Dilley",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harding v. Dilley",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "528",
  "last_page": "528",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "60 Ill. 528"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1101,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.471,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3473216006029695
    },
    "sha256": "f70c20f4d081e752490a1be9de8e409047e45bf815ded99156d488301b7aaa2d",
    "simhash": "1:44f5fd612871cdf9",
    "word_count": 187
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:24:14.980306+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nathan G. Harding et al. v. John W. Dilley."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nIn this case, the seventh instruction for the defendant was, that the indorser of a note could not be held without demand and notice. This, under our statute, was erroneous.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Kidder & Noecboss, for the appellants.",
      "Messrs. StewaRt & Phelps, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nathan G. Harding et al. v. John W. Dilley.\nPeomissoky notliability of indorser. It is not nece'ssaryin this State, in order to fix the liability of the indorser of a promissory note to the in-dorsee, that the latter should prove a demand upon the maker of the note, a refusal to pay, and notice to the indorser of non-payment.\nAppeal from tbe Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action of assumpsit, brought by Nathan G. Harding and Alvin Bryan against John W. Dilley, as in-dorser of a. promissory note made by one Seneca S. Lake, to defendant, and by him indorsed to the plaintiffs. Upon a trial in the circuit court judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant, from which the plaintiffs appeal.\nMessrs. Kidder & Noecboss, for the appellants.\nMessrs. StewaRt & Phelps, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0528-01",
  "first_page_order": 530,
  "last_page_order": 530
}