{
  "id": 2461443,
  "name": "Peter Keller v. Joseph H. Rossbach",
  "name_abbreviation": "Keller v. Rossbach",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "342",
  "last_page": "343",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 Ill. 342"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 103,
    "char_count": 1070,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.079572127879695e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3753564396997663
    },
    "sha256": "de34f17448f26a409d88964fe1c0a278856cc4433a087f7804e6850f741173bf",
    "simhash": "1:9a0f777df0ee851f",
    "word_count": 179
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:01.960225+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Peter Keller v. Joseph H. Rossbach."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThere was no ground of objection to the depositions. Notice was given to appellant\u2019s attorney of the time of suing out the dedimus, with interrogatories, in full compliance with section 10 of chapter 40, R. Stat. 233, and they were returned to the superior court enclosed with the dedimus.\nThe proof of indebtedness is overwhelming in favor of appellee, and the verdict was right, and the judgment must be affirmed.\nJudgment affii'med.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Thomas Shirley, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. Adolph Moses, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Peter Keller v. Joseph H. Rossbach.\nNew trial\u2014verdict against the evidence. In this case, the verdict of the jury is regarded as sustained by the evidence.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Wm. A. Porter, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action of assumpsit, brought by Eossbach against Keller to recover for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant.\nA trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $365. To reverse this judgment the defendant appeals.\nMr. Thomas Shirley, for the appellant.\nMr. Adolph Moses, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0342-01",
  "first_page_order": 342,
  "last_page_order": 343
}