{
  "id": 2459933,
  "name": "Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Benjamin Hobble",
  "name_abbreviation": "Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Hobble",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "388",
  "last_page": "389",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 Ill. 388"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 853,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.583,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 8.919803056698028e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5004944303702649
    },
    "sha256": "80375ca1cf1610641a62a8794f2bfae0d1f9e42bf280574cff45c46107fa6e81",
    "simhash": "1:c0a53a5b2c882469",
    "word_count": 142
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:01.960225+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Benjamin Hobble."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nNo question of law is presented for our consideration.\nWe have reviewed the evidence and affirm the judgment.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Ingersoll & McCune, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. McCulloch & Bice, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Benjamin Hobble.\nNew trial\u2014verdict against the evidence. In this case, the verdict of the jury is regarded as sustained by the evidence,\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria comity; the Hon. S. D. Puteebaugh, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action on the case, brought by Hobble against the railway company to recover the value of a horse killed by a train of cars on the railway of the defendant, through the alleged negligence of the latter. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $160, to reverse which judgment the defendant appeals.\nMessrs. Ingersoll & McCune, for the appellant.\nMessrs. McCulloch & Bice, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0388-01",
  "first_page_order": 388,
  "last_page_order": 389
}