{
  "id": 2461472,
  "name": "Carter H. Harrison v. The City of Chicago, and James E. Tyler et al. v. Same",
  "name_abbreviation": "Harrison v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "459",
  "last_page": "460",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "61 Ill. 459"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1482,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.947487136851577e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3114447985191415
    },
    "sha256": "f56f324ff711852c696b2cab473f6d3fe4f863d6eafd6442923c4eeb6af63300",
    "simhash": "1:e168d416fab3409b",
    "word_count": 252
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:22:01.960225+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carter H. Harrison v. The City of Chicago, and James E. Tyler et al. v. Same."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis was a judgment rendered at the March term, 1871, of the Superior Court, in favor of the city, upon a special assessment warrant to make up the amount which the city failed to collect of a former assessment.\nThe only defect in the former proceeding ivas in the printer\u2019s certificate of publication of notice of application to the council for confirmation. It does not appear that the ordinance in the former proceedings was void.\nThese cases, .presenting the same state of facts in each, are distinguishable from that of Workman v. City of Chicago, post, 463, and Ave are not prepared to hold that the new assessment Avas void, as the case noiv stands.\nBut the collector Avas unauthorized to apply for judgment, and for that reason the judgments will be reversed and the causes remanded.\nJudgments reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Spafford, McDaid & Wilson, for the appellants.",
      "Mr. M. F. Tuley, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Carter H. Harrison v. The City of Chicago, and James E. Tyler et al. v. Same.\nSpecial assessment\u2014of a new assessment. Upon an application for judgment upon a new special assessment for tlie deficiency which the city of Chicago failed to collect of a former assessment, where the only defect in the original proceeding was in the printer\u2019s certificate of notice of application to the council for confirmation, the ordinance under which it was had being free from objection, it was held, the new assessment was not void.\nAppeals from the Superior Court of Cook county.\nMessrs. Spafford, McDaid & Wilson, for the appellants.\nMr. M. F. Tuley, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0459-01",
  "first_page_order": 459,
  "last_page_order": 460
}