{
  "id": 2607407,
  "name": "George W. Fitch v. Solomon Zimmer",
  "name_abbreviation": "Fitch v. Zimmer",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "126",
  "last_page": "127",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "62 Ill. 126"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 908,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.574,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.0983495035656136e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5674257456708865
    },
    "sha256": "0f40f8b62aceb631e5ab62b3adf0822a3378c85ae3fd54edd784881767417cb3",
    "simhash": "1:df0f74eaaa24a6f1",
    "word_count": 144
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:06:21.204499+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George W. Fitch v. Solomon Zimmer."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis was an action of covenant, by the lessor against the lessee. \u00a1Numerous breaches were assigned, and testimony heard upon each of them.\nThe evidence, though somewhat conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.\nThere is not a single question presented, which the jury were not fully competent to determine.\nAfter a careful review of the evidence, we are unwilling to disturb the finding.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Henry & Johnson, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Wilkinson, Sackett & Bean, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George W. Fitch v. Solomon Zimmer.\n1. New Tbial\u2014-finding as to facts. When the questions for determination are ones of fact only, and the evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the verdict, this court will not disturb the finding.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside County; the Hon. William W. Heaton, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Henry & Johnson, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Wilkinson, Sackett & Bean, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0126-01",
  "first_page_order": 126,
  "last_page_order": 127
}