{
  "id": 2607382,
  "name": "John McInhill v. Abraham Odell et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "McInhill v. Odell",
  "decision_date": "1871-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "169",
  "last_page": "170",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "62 Ill. 169"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1719,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.114690476913653e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5716041746063187
    },
    "sha256": "afbc4cf02fe8d3aac0363e71dd1b85d70fb63770f5b7c256f8f09cbc3e0822ee",
    "simhash": "1:9a2ff084ec8826f3",
    "word_count": 305
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:06:21.204499+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John McInhill v. Abraham Odell et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe decree in this case, so far as it requires the amount found due to be paid in gold, must, under the authority of the cases reported in 11 Wallace 682, under the title of legal tender cases, he reversed. The cases referred to are the latest decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States upon that subject, and are binding upon us, since the question involved arises under the Constitution of the United States.\nThe answer claims a homestead for John Mclnhill, but admits the fee to have been in Edward Mclnhill. The record contains nothing \u2022 showing a homestead right in John Mclnhill. Decree reversed and cause remanded.\nDeoree reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. B. F. Parks, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. C. J. Metzner, for the appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John McInhill v. Abraham Odell et al.\n1. Legal tender. A decree on the foreclosure of a mortgage required the payment of the sum found due to be paid in gold coin. The note and mortgage were made before the passage of the legal tender act, and contained no provision as to what kind of money should be paid, but were in the usual form for the payment of so many dollars: Held, that the decree in this respect was erroneous.\n2. Supreme Court of the United States\u2014decisions when binding on this court. The decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States upon questions arising under the Federal Constitution are binding upon this court.\nAppeal from the Court of Common Pleas of the city of Aurora; the Hon. Richard G. Moktomy, Judge, presiding.\nThis was a bill to foreclose two mortgages given to secure two promissory notes. Neither the notes nor mortgages provided for payment in gold, but they were in the ordinary form. They were made before the passage of the legal tender act.\nMr. B. F. Parks, for the appellant.\nMr. C. J. Metzner, for the appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0169-01",
  "first_page_order": 169,
  "last_page_order": 170
}