{
  "id": 2609879,
  "name": "Margaret J. Eakin v. Mahala E. Eakin",
  "name_abbreviation": "Eakin v. Eakin",
  "decision_date": "1872-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "160",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "63 Ill. 160"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 91,
    "char_count": 1063,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.761372246577101e-08,
      "percentile": 0.45605515997264706
    },
    "sha256": "d3f78a3fe4e828e9ca5063ffaa0aa1da3638c9a0aecbe7afd336a9723f62cd13",
    "simhash": "1:e3c382e16f74415b",
    "word_count": 182
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:30:19.405961+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Margaret J. Eakin v. Mahala E. Eakin."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe jury were fully justified in the conclusion, from the evidence, that the plaintiff below was the owner of only three-fourths of the piano.\nAs she claimed the entire .ownership, she could not recover in replevin under the proof.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. E. S. Terry, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. D. D. Evans, and Mr. J. B. Mann, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Margaret J. Eakin v. Mahala E. Eakin.\nReplevin\u2014where plaintiff claims entire ownership\u2014of the proof required. Where the plaintiff in an action of replevin claims the entire ownership of the property, a recovery can not he had upon proof that he was the owner of three-fourths only of the article or thing replevied.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion county; the Hon. James Steele, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action of replevin, brought by Margaret J. Eakin against Mahala E. Eakin, for the recovery of a piano. The plaintiff claimed the instrument as her sole property. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.\nMr. E. S. Terry, for the appellant.\nMr. D. D. Evans, and Mr. J. B. Mann, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0160-01",
  "first_page_order": 162,
  "last_page_order": 162
}