{
  "id": 2617410,
  "name": "Joseph Lubliner v. William L. Yeomans",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lubliner v. Yeomans",
  "decision_date": "1872-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "305",
  "last_page": "306",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "65 Ill. 305"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "12 Ill. 482",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2577205
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/12/0482-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 119,
    "char_count": 1359,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.583,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.157786812253659e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5083798321832663
    },
    "sha256": "893bac871830a94065de975fb3cf4534ab9991797441e1dc58a867ff006b1a30",
    "simhash": "1:3ad025a97b9f0e82",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:51:24.172785+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Lubliner v. William L. Yeomans."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Sheldon\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThe main question arising on this record is one of fact, involving a matter of account in a mechanic's lien proceeding, where there are items of account on both sides and the testimony is conflicting.\nThe judge who heard the cause saw the witnesses in the giving of their testimony, and had superior means to ourselves of judging of their credibility. From an examination \"of the testimony, we do not find the decree of the court to be so manifestly against the weight of the evidence as to require that it should be disturbed.\nIt is objected that the court appointed a special master in chancery to execute the decree. It will be presumed such appointment was properly made, the record showing nothing to the contrary. Farnsworth v. Strasler, 12 Ill. 482.\nThe decree is affirmed.\nDecree affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Sheldon"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. E. McPherran, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Dinsmoor & Stager, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Lubliner v. William L. Yeomans.\nChancery\u2014appointment of special master. Where the circuit court, on the hearing of a petition for a mechanic\u2019s lien, appointed a special master to execute the decree: Held, that it would be.presumed that such appointment was properly made, the record showing nothing to the contrary.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. William W. Heaton, Judge, presiding.\nMr. J. E. McPherran, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Dinsmoor & Stager, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0305-01",
  "first_page_order": 305,
  "last_page_order": 306
}