{
  "id": 2621161,
  "name": "William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hennies v. Vogel",
  "decision_date": "1872-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "401",
  "last_page": "402",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "66 Ill. 401"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "63 Ill. 430",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2612674
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/63/0430-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "52 Ill. 260",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5301862
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/52/0260-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 125,
    "char_count": 1513,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.3343883090541577e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7914621663270716
    },
    "sha256": "e87e162567f82e97220d2b6260dcd23fb94840179edb8a2d20b3ce93207f2cdf",
    "simhash": "1:295004e25aa47505",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:46:41.963849+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis action was brought by husband and wife for personal injuries to the wife.\nThis court held in C. B. and Q. R. R. Co. v. Dunn, 52 Ill. 260, that a right of action arising by reason of personal injuries received by a married woman was her separate property, and to recover damages for such injuries she must sue alone. This doctrine was repeated in Hayner et al. v. Smith et al. 63 Ill. 430.\nFor any loss to the husband by reason of his wife\u2019s disabilities so occasioned, he has his separate remedy.\nThe record shows the husband had no cause of action.\nThe judgment of the court below is reversed.\nJicdgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Chables J. Beattie, for the appellants.",
      "Mr. L. E. Paysoh, for the appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Hennies et al. v. Michael Vogel et ux.\n1. Husband and wipe&emdash;wife must sue alone for personal injmy to Tier. A right of action accruing by reason of personal injuries received by a married woman is her separate property, and'to recover damages for such injury, she must sue alone. For any loss to the husband by reason of his wife\u2019s disabilities so occasioned, he has his separate remedy.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. Chables H. Wood, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an action of trespass, brought by Michael Vogel and Mary Vogel, his wife, against the appellants, for an assault and battery, and other personal injury, alleged to have been committed upon the person of Mary Vogel, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellees for $1112.50.\nMr. Chables J. Beattie, for the appellants.\nMr. L. E. Paysoh, for the appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0401-01",
  "first_page_order": 401,
  "last_page_order": 402
}