{
  "id": 2715137,
  "name": "Francis M. Neely v. John K. Wright",
  "name_abbreviation": "Neely v. Wright",
  "decision_date": "1874-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "292",
  "last_page": "292",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "72 Ill. 292"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "38 Ill. 198",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "17 Ill. 238",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2591200
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/17/0238-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1542,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.8764935098143446e-07,
      "percentile": 0.727003775123569
    },
    "sha256": "fee3f3b2a2f9fcea11fda0424fc8152b01ce5b560f04f75014f1488ba60b05ef",
    "simhash": "1:fde135a64cff8ef0",
    "word_count": 267
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:43:15.201732+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Francis M. Neely v. John K. Wright."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Craig\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis was an action of forcible detainer, commenced before a justice of the peace. In the circuit court the defendant was ruled to file an amended appeal bond by a specified time. An amended bond was filed, which the court' held insufficient, and dismissed the appeal.\nThe defendant appeals to this court, and assigns for error the decision of the circuit court in dismissing the appeal and refusing to permit him to file another amended bond.\nThe record contains no bill of exceptions, nor does it appear that defendant excepted to any decision of the court made in the cause.\nWe can not consider the points made by appellant, for the reason that no exception was taken in the court below. Had the defendant desired to review the decision of the circuit court, he should have excepted to the ruling of the court, and preserved the exceptions in the record. Parsons v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 198.\nThe judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Craig"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. George Vernor, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Watts & Forman, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Francis M. Neely v. John K. Wright.\nBill of exceptions\u2014when necessa/ry. Where there is no hill of exceptions, and it does not appear in the record that exceptions were taken to the ruling of the court below in dismissing an appeal for want of a sufficient amended appeal bond, such ruling will not be reviewed in this court.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Washington county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.\nMr. George Vernor, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Watts & Forman, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0292-01",
  "first_page_order": 292,
  "last_page_order": 292
}