{
  "id": 2702329,
  "name": "William Y. Daniels v. Charles R. Osborn et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Daniels v. Osborn",
  "decision_date": "1874-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "615",
  "last_page": "616",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "75 Ill. 615"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 138,
    "char_count": 1721,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.486,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.217630986078995e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5101038709206599
    },
    "sha256": "4bd6489924e37a46a9c6467086d54f5d0261891a87c59bf44fecaf233ef9ada9",
    "simhash": "1:9cebc3e6f077262e",
    "word_count": 292
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:18:05.325327+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Y. Daniels v. Charles R. Osborn et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "This was an action of assumpsit, brought by appellees, in the Superior Court of Cook county, against appellant, upon an account for goods sold and delivered.\nA jury having been waived, the court found the issues in favor of appellees, and rendered a judgment against appellant of $283.60, the amount of the account, with six per cent interest from the time it was due.\nThe only ground of error relied upon is, that the court allowed interest upon the account.\nIt appears, from the evidence, that the account was due, and appellant promised to pay it, in October, 1871.\nThe statute provides, that interest may be allowed at the rate of six per cent per annum, on money withheld by an unreasonable and vexatious delay of payment.\nAppellant conceded that the account was due in October, 1871, at which time he promised to pay it. He failed and refused to perform his agreement, without any excuse. Under such circumstances, the court was justified in holding that the delay in payment was unreasonable and vexatious, within 'the meaning of the statute.\nThe judgment will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. C. S. Cameron, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the Court:"
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Y. Daniels v. Charles R. Osborn et al.\nInterest\u2014when recoverable on account. Where a party, owing an account, in October, 1871, admitted its correctness, and promised to pay the same, which he neglected to do, without any excuse, for about three years it was held that he was properly chargeable with interest on the same, the delay being considered, unreasonable and vexatious.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.\nThe suit was brought in this case in July, 1874.\nMr. C. S. Cameron, for the appellant.\nMr. Justice Craig delivered the opinion of the Court:"
  },
  "file_name": "0615-01",
  "first_page_order": 615,
  "last_page_order": 616
}