{
  "id": 5343569,
  "name": "The People ex rel. Louis C. Huck v. John S. Quick et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "People ex rel. Huck v. Quick",
  "decision_date": "1877-09",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "435",
  "last_page": "436",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "87 Ill. 435"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1425,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.541,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.8423223023812985e-07,
      "percentile": 0.8400250362086747
    },
    "sha256": "b1f1fcc171d90e8dc6c66cbe0235e07a6ecc044917c97f39e8c9baf0328c9e9d",
    "simhash": "1:123330c2774e0e54",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:46.129665+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People ex rel. Louis C. Huck v. John S. Quick et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nIt is sufficient for the disposal of this case to say, that it does not appear from the record that appellees had any interest in any of the lands in question. No evidence was offered to that effect. The lands are not taxed in the names of appellees as owners.\nUnless such interest is made to appear, no objections will be entertained which may be made by a person against a judgment for the sale of delinquent lands for taxes, as this court has heretofore decided.\nThe judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. Francis Adams, for the appellants.",
      "Mr. John P. Wilson, for the appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People ex rel. Louis C. Huck v. John S. Quick et al.\nTaxes\u2014who may object to judgment. Unless a party\u2019s interest in the lands, against which judgment is sought for taxes, is made to appear, no objection in his behalf to the rendition of judgment can be entertained. If the land is not taxed in his name, he must show his interest.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin R. M. Wallace, Judge, presiding.\nThis was an application by Louis C. Huck, as collector of Cook county, for judgment against certain lands. The court below sustained certain objections made by the appellees. Evidence was heard by the court below in support of the objections, and it does not appear that any question was made in the court below as to the objector\u2019s right to resist the application.\nMr. Francis Adams, for the appellants.\nMr. John P. Wilson, for the appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0435-01",
  "first_page_order": 435,
  "last_page_order": 436
}