{
  "id": 2728763,
  "name": "Benjamin Wilson et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wilson v. People",
  "decision_date": "1880-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "426",
  "last_page": "427",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "94 Ill. 426"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "90 Ill. 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2757549
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/90/0510-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "67 Ill. 504",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "weight": 2,
      "pin_cites": [
        {
          "page": "520"
        }
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "90 Ill. 510",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2757549
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/90/0510-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 189,
    "char_count": 2987,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.6031395987338713e-07,
      "percentile": 0.684225026246704
    },
    "sha256": "d8649152250b4b888095d571144d781ca6ad84b1880cf990484df285eccbaef5",
    "simhash": "1:c1e1957e43176a8c",
    "word_count": 505
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:30:34.542925+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Benjamin Wilson et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Craig\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThe defendants were indicted and convicted under section 60, chapter 38, Rev. Stat. 1874, p. 360, which declares: \u201c Whoever wilfully interrupts or disturbs any school or other assembly of people met for a lawful purpose, shall be fined not exceediug $100.\u201d\nThe point relied upon to reverse the judgment is, as the offence for which the defendants were convicted was a mere misdemeanor, the circuit court had no original jurisdiction of the offence; that, under a fair construction of sections 381 and 392 of the Criminal Code, jurisdiction in such cases was conferred upon justices of the peace.\nIn Ferguson v. The People, 90 Ill. 510, where the defendants were indicted for a riot, and one of them convicted of an assault and battery, it was held, under the sections of the statute, supra, that the circuit court had no original jurisdiction in cases of assault and battery, it being conferred upon justices of the peace. In the decision of that case our attention was not called to article 6, section 12 of the constitution, which declares that \u201cthe circuit courts shall have original jurisdiction of all causes in law and equity.\u201d Under this provision of the constitution, the legislature had no power to deprive the circuit courts of such jurisdiction as was expressly conferred by that instrument. Myers v. The People, 67 Ill. 504; Weatherford v. The People, id. 520.\nIt is no doubt true that concurrent jurisdiction may properly be conferred upon justices of the peace, in misdemeanors, where the fine does not exceed the jurisdiction of the justice; yet, as the jurisdiction of the circuit courts has been conferred by the constitution, that can not be taken away.\nAs the decision in Ferguson v. The People is in conflict with the views here expressed, it will be overruled.\nThe judgment of the circuit court will be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Craig"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. J. B. Cohrs, and Mr. W. D. Maus, for the plaintiffs in error.",
      "Mr. James K. Ebsall, Attorney General, for the People."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Benjamin Wilson et al. v. The People of the State of Illinois.\n1. Jurisdiction or circuit court\u2014misdemeanors. Section 12 of article 6 of the constitution provides that \u201cthe circuit cpurts shall have original jurisdiction of all cases in law or equity; \u201d\u2014so, those courts have original jurisdiction in cases of misdemeanors, as, for wilfully interrupting or disturbing an assembly of people met for a lawful purpose.\n2. Siam\u2014former decision. In Ferguson v. The People, 90 Ill. 510, it was held that the circuit courts did not have original jurisdiction in cases of assault and assault and battery, it being conferred by statute upon justices of the peace. But it is not competent for the legislature to deprive the circuit courts of their original jurisdiction conferred by the constitution in all cases in law and equity, and in this regard that case is overruled.\nWrit oe Error to the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. John Burns, Judge, presiding.\nMr. J. B. Cohrs, and Mr. W. D. Maus, for the plaintiffs in error.\nMr. James K. Ebsall, Attorney General, for the People."
  },
  "file_name": "0426-01",
  "first_page_order": 426,
  "last_page_order": 427
}