{
  "id": 8552338,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY MARTIN, JR.",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Martin",
  "decision_date": "1970-12-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 7010SC611",
  "first_page": "181",
  "last_page": "182",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "10 N.C. App. 181"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 165,
    "char_count": 2178,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.3181068408277913e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7896103209106013
    },
    "sha256": "f3103628d5434aac0074f1ca88f5eda773ca85313136bed67249b9f8a9757923",
    "simhash": "1:72cb4d010f3f350d",
    "word_count": 359
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:51:53.441044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Mor\u00e9is and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY MARTIN, JR."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Judge.\nDefendant excepts to and assigns as error the entry of judgment in each case; these assignments of error present the cases for review for error appearing on the face of the records. 3 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Criminal Law \u00a7 161, p. 112.\nThe bill of indictment in each case is proper in form and clearly identifies the premises broken into. Defendant was represented by experienced counsel appointed by the Court. The trial judge painstakingly examined defendant concerning his understanding and the voluntariness of his pleas of guilty; and upon competent evidence determined that the pleas were understandingly and voluntarily entered. The sentences imposed are well within the limits of what legally might have been imposed.\nOn appeal defense counsel candidly states that he can find no error; with this appraisal we agree.\nNo error.\nJudges Mor\u00e9is and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan, by Trial Attorney Jacobs, for the State.",
      "Peyton B. Abbott for defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY MARTIN, JR.\nNo. 7010SC611\n(Filed 16 December 1970)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 161\u2014 assignment of error to the entry of judgment \u2014 review on appeal\nAn assignment of error to the entry of judgment presents the case for review for error appearing on the face of the record.\nAppeal by defendant from Bailey, Judge of the Superior Court, 2 June 1970 Session, Wake Superior Court.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment (in case number 70 CR 14985) with a felonious breaking or entering of the Lig\u00f3n High School building, and with felonious larceny of .property therefrom. He was charged in another bill of indictment (in case number 70 CR 14987) with a felonious breaking or entering of the Mary E. Phillips School building, and with felonious larceny of property therefrom.\nThe two cases were consolidated for trial. Upon defendant's pleas of guilty as charged, the two counts in 70 CR 14985 were consolidated for judgment, and judgment of imprisonment for ten years was entered; the two counts in 70 CR 14987 were consolidated for judgment, and judgment of imprisonment for ten years was entered; it was ordered that the two sentences run concurrently.\nDefendant appealed.\nAttorney General Morgan, by Trial Attorney Jacobs, for the State.\nPeyton B. Abbott for defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0181-01",
  "first_page_order": 205,
  "last_page_order": 206
}