{
  "id": 8552428,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES GORDON JONES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Jones",
  "decision_date": "1970-12-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 7019SC669",
  "first_page": "184",
  "last_page": "185",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "10 N.C. App. 184"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "153 S.E. 2d 34",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1967,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "269 N.C. 521",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8564570
      ],
      "year": 1967,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/269/0521-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 150,
    "char_count": 1762,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2059405780028102
    },
    "sha256": "87cf542976420e09dafc57cad2576b4e539e3c72168ec595e5cb534e9a140f20",
    "simhash": "1:33dd1e164421e2ce",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:51:53.441044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES GORDON JONES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "CAMPBELL, Judge.\nThe defendant asserts that the punishment was cruel and excessive. There is no merit in this exception. State v. Caldwell, 269 N.C. 521, 153 S.E. 2d 34 (1967). We have reviewed the record and agree with the candid statement of counsel for the defendant that no error appears in the record.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Britt and Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "CAMPBELL, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney James L. Blackburn for the State.",
      "Williams, Willeford and Boger by Thomas M. Brady for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CHARLES GORDON JONES\nNo. 7019SC669\n(Filed 16 December 1970)\nConstitutional Law \u00a7 36\u2014 cruel and excessive punishment \u2014 sentencing of youthful offender\nConsecutive sentences of two years\u2019 imprisonment, each of which was imposed upon a youthful offender\u2019s pleas of guilty to nonfelonious breaking and entering and to felonious larceny, were not cruel and excessive punishment. G.S. 148-49.4.\nAppeal by defendant from Thornburg, Special Judge, August 1970 Session Cabarrus Superior Court.\nThe defendant was tried on a bill of indictment containing two counts: one, a count of felonious breaking and entering, and the second count with felonious larceny of two hams after the breaking and entering.\nThe defendant, in person and through his court-appointed attorney, in open court, entered a plea of guilty to non-felonious breaking and entering and non-felonious larceny. The trial judge found that the plea in each case was entered freely, voluntarily and understandingly and thereupon sentenced the defendant to two consecutive sentences of two years each to the custody of the Commissioner of Corrections for treatment and supervision under G.S. 148 Section 49.4 entitled \u201cSentencing a Youthful Offender.\u201d The defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney James L. Blackburn for the State.\nWilliams, Willeford and Boger by Thomas M. Brady for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0184-01",
  "first_page_order": 208,
  "last_page_order": 209
}