{
  "id": 8552498,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MONROE SYLVESTER KORN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Korn",
  "decision_date": "1970-12-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 704SC434",
  "first_page": "187",
  "last_page": "187",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "10 N.C. App. 187"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1411,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.554,
    "sha256": "1f0bb931f3fedc8d864af2e3213f27d1702eaf69d75143bd321ee6a68d49dc67",
    "simhash": "1:97eda7a10182a573",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:51:53.441044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Graham concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MONROE SYLVESTER KORN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PARKER, Judge.\nWhen the court\u2019s charge to the jury is considered as a whole, it is apparent that in this case the experienced trial judge failed to properly \u201cdeclare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case.\u201d G.S. 1-180. For this failure, defendant is entitled to a\nNew trial.\nChief Judge Mallard and Judge Graham concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PARKER, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General William B. Ray for the State.",
      "Narron & Holdford by William H. Holdford for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MONROE SYLVESTER KORN\nNo. 704SC434\n(Filed 16 December 1970)\nAutomobiles \u00a7 129\u2014 driving under the influence \u2014 failure to explain law arising on evidence\nIn this prosecution for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, defendant is entitled to a new trial for failure of the court to \u201cdeclare and explain the law arising on the evidence in the case.\u201d G.S. 1-180.\nAppeal by defendant from Burgwyn, J., 2 March 1970 Session of Duplin Superior Court.\nDefendant was charged by warrant with operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this State while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. In the district court he pleaded not guilty, was found guilty, and from sentence imposed appealed to the superior court, where he was tried de novo. He again pleaded not guilty, was found guilty by the jury, and from judgment imposed appealed to the Court of Appeals.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Assistant Attorney General William B. Ray for the State.\nNarron & Holdford by William H. Holdford for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0187-01",
  "first_page_order": 211,
  "last_page_order": 211
}