{
  "id": 8552526,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GEORGE FRANKLIN FARRIS",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Farris",
  "decision_date": "1970-12-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 7025SC661",
  "first_page": "188",
  "last_page": "188",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "10 N.C. App. 188"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "144 S.E. 2d 901",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1965,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "265 N.C. 711",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8576913
      ],
      "year": 1965,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/265/0711-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1502,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.521,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20594173637150273
    },
    "sha256": "0680fd8b98f427fe2328f76f3581c09debaf303eb803fab322a69832f5c8816f",
    "simhash": "1:d4efa6da30da3a5b",
    "word_count": 243
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:51:53.441044+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GEORGE FRANKLIN FARRIS"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "CAMPBELL, Judge.\nThe defendant assigns as error that he did not receive a sentence the same as the sentence imposed upon one of the co-conspirators. There is no merit in this assignment of error. State v. Garris, 265 N.C. 711, 144 S.E. 2d 901 (1965).\nWe have reviewed the record in this case and find no prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Britt and Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "CAMPBELL, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan, by Deputy Attorney General R. Bruce White, Jr., and Staff Attorney Ladson F. Hart for the State.",
      "Larry W. Pitts for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. GEORGE FRANKLIN FARRIS\nNo. 7025SC661\n(Filed 16 December 1970)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 138\u2014 sentence of defendant different than sentence of co-conspirator\nThe fact that defendant did not receive the same sentence as that received by one of his co-conspirators is not ground for legal objection.\nAppeal by defendant from McLean, Judge, 31 August 1970 Criminal Session of Catawba County Superior Court.\nThe defendant, along with eight others, was charged in a bill of indictment with conspiracy to utter forged instruments, namely, payroll checks drawn on Broyhill Furniture Industries.\nThe defendant, in person and through his court-appointed attorney, entered a plea of guilty. The trial judge ascertained and adjudicated in open court that the plea was entered freely, voluntarily and understandingly. From a sentence of not less than nine and one-half years to not more than ten years in the State Department of Correction, the defendant appeals.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan, by Deputy Attorney General R. Bruce White, Jr., and Staff Attorney Ladson F. Hart for the State.\nLarry W. Pitts for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0188-01",
  "first_page_order": 212,
  "last_page_order": 212
}