{
  "id": 8525365,
  "name": "BRENDA M. GILLESPIE v. DENNIS R. GILLESPIE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gillespie v. Gillespie",
  "decision_date": "1994-10-18",
  "docket_number": "No. 9329DC1267",
  "first_page": "660",
  "last_page": "661",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "116 N.C. App. 660"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "285 S.E.2d 281",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "55 N.C. App. 250",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8527082
      ],
      "year": 1981,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/55/0250-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "289 S.E.2d 105",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "56 N.C. App. 465",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8522035
      ],
      "weight": 2,
      "year": 1982,
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/56/0465-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 176,
    "char_count": 2119,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.744,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.676830387708631e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3566860461748928
    },
    "sha256": "55fa18f27bc36f7481ee6bd18b3a74dafd1a0b906d29a4a611cdae2012341147",
    "simhash": "1:86a852c57c8e38f0",
    "word_count": 346
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:38:55.005039+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges MARTIN and THOMPSON concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "BRENDA M. GILLESPIE v. DENNIS R. GILLESPIE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "ARNOLD, Chief Judge.\nThis appeal is interlocutory and must be dismissed according to this Court\u2019s holding in Fliehr v. Fliehr, 56 N.C. App. 465, 289 S.E.2d 105 (1982).\nThe order appealed from in this case was for child custody and child support in conjunction with an order awarding alimony pendente lite. The Court in Fliehr concluded that if we allow such appeals we would defeat the purpose announced in Stephenson v. Stephenson, 55 N.C. App. 250, 285 S.E.2d 281 (1981) of avoiding appeals from temporary support orders sought merely for the purpose of delay. Fliehr, 56 N.C. App. 465, 289 S.E.2d 105. Therefore, defendant\u2019s assignment of error pertaining to the child support order is not reviewable on appeal until entry of a final order on plaintiff\u2019s claim for permanent alimony. Id.-, see also N.C. Gen. Stat. \u00a7 1A-1, Rule 54(b) (1990).\nDismissed.\nJudges MARTIN and THOMPSON concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "ARNOLD, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Averette & Barton, by Donald H. Barton, for plaintiff appellee.",
      "Ramsey, Hill, Smart, Ramsey & Pratt, P.A., by Michael K. Pratt, for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "BRENDA M. GILLESPIE v. DENNIS R. GILLESPIE\nNo. 9329DC1267\n(Filed 18 October 1994)\nDivorce and Separation \u00a7 450 (NCI4th)\u2014 child support \u2014 order not appealable until entry of permanent alimony order\nDefendant\u2019s assignment of error pertaining to a child support order was not reviewable on appeal until entry of a final order on plaintiff\u2019s claim for permanent alimony.\nAm Jur 2d, Appeal and Error \u00a7\u00a7 50 et seq.\nAppeal by defendant from order entered 7 October 1993 by Judge Mark E. Powell in Transylvania County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 14 September 1994.\nPlaintiff and defendant married in 1969 and adopted two minor children. They separated on 2 January 1993. Plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce from bed and board, alimony, alimony pendente lite, child custody, child support and equitable distribution on 28 June 1993. After a hearing, the trial court ordered custody of the two minor children to plaintiff, as well as an award for child support and alimony pendente lite. Defendant appeals portions of the order only with regard to child support.\nAverette & Barton, by Donald H. Barton, for plaintiff appellee.\nRamsey, Hill, Smart, Ramsey & Pratt, P.A., by Michael K. Pratt, for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0660-01",
  "first_page_order": 690,
  "last_page_order": 691
}