{
  "id": 8547174,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS STEPHEN FRANCUM",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Francum",
  "decision_date": "1971-07-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 7128SC452",
  "first_page": "37",
  "last_page": "37",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 N.C. App. 37"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "174 S.E. 2d 27",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "8 N.C. App. 330",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        8551624
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc-app/8/0330-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1110,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.535,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2058372901277256
    },
    "sha256": "c81711bc476748acfd9723bc7746d7154d7e6ef26e098d13ff367a977ce628b4",
    "simhash": "1:87564c7c167c812f",
    "word_count": 190
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:50:27.087613+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Brock and Graham concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS STEPHEN FRANCUM"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nDefendant\u2019s court-appointed counsel has made no assignments of error and states that the case is brought forward to seek such relief as the Court might find the appellant entitled. The purported appeal is from a judgment denying defendant relief under a paper writing which he labeled a \u201cwrit of habeas corpus\u201d and which was treated as such by the able trial judge. Except in cases' involving the custody of minor children, an appeal does not lie from a judgment on return to a writ of habeas corpus. In re Wright, 8 N.C. App. 330, 174 S.E. 2d 27.\nAppeal dismissed.\nJudges Brock and Graham concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney L. Philip Covington for the State.",
      "Melvin K. Elias for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. THOMAS STEPHEN FRANCUM\nNo. 7128SC452\n(Filed 14 July 1971)\nHabeas Corpus \u00a7 4\u2014 habeas corpus \u2014 appeal\nExcept in cases involving the custody of minor children, an appeal does not lie from a judgment on return to a writ of habeas corpus.\nPurported appeal by defendant from Ervin, J., 19 April 1971 Session of Superior Court held in Buncombe County.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney L. Philip Covington for the State.\nMelvin K. Elias for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0037-01",
  "first_page_order": 63,
  "last_page_order": 63
}