{
  "id": 8547321,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM ALBERT LOCKLER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Lockler",
  "decision_date": "1971-07-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 7126SC449",
  "first_page": "46",
  "last_page": "46",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 N.C. App. 46"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 98,
    "char_count": 900,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "2329dbe080452a6b24726cf1f93c876ca71ac29dbd0f8890903102aa249554c3",
    "simhash": "1:1fc5592064fcd29a",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:50:27.087613+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Brock and Graham concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM ALBERT LOCKLER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nDefendant\u2019s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he states that he is unable to find error in the proceedings. We have reviewed the record proper and find no prejudicial error.\nAffirmed.\nJudges Brock and Graham concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney Russell G. Walker for the State.",
      "Plumides and Plumides by Michael S. Shulimson for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM ALBERT LOCKLER\nNo. 7126SC449\n(Filed 14 July 1971)\nAppeal by defendant from Snepp, /., 22 March 1971 Criminal Session of Superior Court held in Mecklenburg County.\nDefendant tendered pleas of guilty to possession of burglary tools and carrying a concealed weapon. The pleas of guilty were accepted after determination by the court that they were freely, understandingly and voluntarily made. From judgments imposing active prison sentences, the defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Staff Attorney Russell G. Walker for the State.\nPlumides and Plumides by Michael S. Shulimson for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0046-01",
  "first_page_order": 72,
  "last_page_order": 72
}