{
  "id": 8552609,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Baldwin",
  "decision_date": "1971-12-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 7122SC751",
  "first_page": "257",
  "last_page": "258",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "13 N.C. App. 257"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 1773,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531358005814238
    },
    "sha256": "3c187103e8d5e0bfbf3e0133a6e63e01f27e045e8375b6f948fc0eb50afa9a2c",
    "simhash": "1:18b6c0cb3db8bc62",
    "word_count": 297
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:15.024983+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "GRAHAM, Judge.\nWe have searched the entire record. No error appears therein and we conclude that defendant had a fair trial free from prejudicial error. We hold his appeal to be frivolous.\nNo error.\nChief Judge Mallard and Judge Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "GRAHAM, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Cole for the State.",
      "Pope, McMillan & Bender by William H. McMillan for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LARRY BALDWIN\nNo. 7122SC751\n(Filed 15 December 1971)\nAppeal by defendant from Crissman, Judge, 24 May 1971 Session of Superior Court held in Iredell County.\nThis case was consolidated for trial with the case of State v. William Baldwin which is the subject of a separate appeal. (See opinion in case No. 7122SC752 by Chief Judge Mallard, filed this date.)\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with the armed robbery of Larry Shives and Lola Shives.\nEvidence for the State tended to show that on 6 January 1971, at approximately 8:40 p.m., defendant and his brother, William Baldwin, entered a store being operated by Larry Shives. One of the men put a gun to Shives\u2019 throat and threatened to kill him if he moved. The other one struck Shives in the head and rendered him unconscious. Shives\u2019 wife, Lola Shives, who was also present, was beaten by defendants about her face, head and breast. Shives regained consciousness as he was being kicked in the ribs and at that time observed money being taken from his pocket. Approximately $3900 was taken from his person and two pistols were removed from his place of business.\nDefendant, through his testimony and that of other witnesses, offered evidence tending to establish an alibi.\nThe jury returned a verdict of guilty and from judgment entered on the verdict defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Morgan by Assistant Attorney General Cole for the State.\nPope, McMillan & Bender by William H. McMillan for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0257-01",
  "first_page_order": 281,
  "last_page_order": 282
}