{
  "id": 8547828,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD GRIFFITH",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Griffith",
  "decision_date": "1972-03-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 7212SC202",
  "first_page": "177",
  "last_page": "177",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "14 N.C. App. 177"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1379,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531369589501163
    },
    "sha256": "75dd6ffdf7aadfcd1d766907b28818c169df92498bae272d3f9d99aa1a97546e",
    "simhash": "1:0e8ba04c14dfd6ab",
    "word_count": 230
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:48.650385+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Hedrick and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD GRIFFITH"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Judge.\nThis appeal was docketed thirty-three days later than the time provided by Rule 5. For that reason it is subject to dismissal. Nevertheless, we have considered the appeal upon its merits. The Assistant Public Defender states that he is unable to find error. We appreciate his candor and, having examined the record, agree with his appraisal.\nNo error.\nJudges Hedrick and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan, by Associate Attorney Jones, for the State.",
      "Assistant Public Defender Taylor for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. EDWARD GRIFFITH\nNo. 7212SC202\n(Filed 29 March 1972)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 155.5\u2014 failure to docket record on appeal in apt time Appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to docket the record on appeal within the time allowed by Court of Appeals Rule 5.\nAppeal by defendant from Hall, Judge, 6 September 1971 Session of Superior Court held in Cumberland County.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment, proper in form, with possession of a quantity of the narcotic drug, heroin.\nThe State\u2019s evidence tended to show that a search of defendant\u2019s apartment by law enforcement officers1 had revealed numerous tinfoil packets containing heroin stored in a glass jar in the bathroom and in a flashlight case in the bedroom.\nUpon a jury verdict of guilty, defendant was sentenced to a term of not less than three nor more than five years.\nAttorney General Morgan, by Associate Attorney Jones, for the State.\nAssistant Public Defender Taylor for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0177-01",
  "first_page_order": 203,
  "last_page_order": 203
}