{
  "id": 8549127,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RUFUS OLDEN CRUSE",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Cruse",
  "decision_date": "1972-04-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 7226SC125",
  "first_page": "295",
  "last_page": "295",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "14 N.C. App. 295"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 822,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.566,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 2.0446031217563963e-07,
      "percentile": 0.7531367658886676
    },
    "sha256": "09213bf03906b9561b1529760a1cb003790092647acc47d5bab6e86b71fd4bb1",
    "simhash": "1:9fcdf144494891e3",
    "word_count": 126
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T22:58:48.650385+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Brock and Hedrick concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RUFUS OLDEN CRUSE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nThough docketed more than three weeks late, we have, in our discretion, considered this appeal on its merits. All of defendant\u2019s assignments of error have been carefully considered. In the trial from which the defendant appealed, we find no prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Brock and Hedrick concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Henry E. Poole for the State.",
      "Lila Bellar for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RUFUS OLDEN CRUSE\nNo. 7226SC125\n(Filed 26 April 1972)\nAppeal by defendant from Copeland, Special Judge, 2 August 1971 Schedule \u201cC\u201d Criminal Session of Superior Court held in Mecklenburg County.\nDefendant was convicted on six counts of uttering forged checks, in violation of G.S. 14-120. From judgments imposing active prison sentences, defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Henry E. Poole for the State.\nLila Bellar for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0295-01",
  "first_page_order": 321,
  "last_page_order": 321
}