{
  "id": 8554043,
  "name": "JAMES ARTHUR PRINGLE, JR. v. DANA FREEMAN PRINGLE",
  "name_abbreviation": "Pringle v. Pringle",
  "decision_date": "1972-11-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 7226DC761",
  "first_page": "648",
  "last_page": "649",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "16 N.C. App. 648"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1154,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.57,
    "sha256": "ac7381c757b29696078e9c305d802f63fa1281fef68d9a3a6d997f0b42c4ec6e",
    "simhash": "1:55dd5a558c19f9d1",
    "word_count": 185
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:31.279819+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Brock and Britt concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "JAMES ARTHUR PRINGLE, JR. v. DANA FREEMAN PRINGLE"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "MALLARD, Chief Judge.\nOn 26 October 1972, the date this cause was calendared for oral argument in this court, the parties, through their respective counsel, filed a written stipulation which contains among other things the following:\n\u201c1. The Order entered by the Honorable Howard B. Ar-buclde, Jr., on April 20, 1972, in the above matter contains errors which subject it to being reversible on appeal.\u201d\nInasmuch as the order dated 20 April 1972, in which reversible error was stipulated, was the order appealed from, the appellant is entitled to a new trial.\nNew trial.\nJudges Brock and Britt concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "MALLARD, Chief Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Olive, Howard & Downer by Leon Olive for plaintiff ap-pellee.",
      "Ruff, Perry, Bond, Cobb, Wade & McNair by Hamlin L. Wade for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "JAMES ARTHUR PRINGLE, JR. v. DANA FREEMAN PRINGLE\nNo. 7226DC761\n(Filed 22 November 1972)\nAppeal and Error \u00a7 62\u2014 stipulation that order contains reversible error \u2014 new trial\nAppellant is entitled to a new trial where it was stipulated that the order appealed from contains reversible error.\nAppeal by defendant from Arbuckle, District Judge, 10 April 1972 Session of District Court held in Mecklenburg County.\nOlive, Howard & Downer by Leon Olive for plaintiff ap-pellee.\nRuff, Perry, Bond, Cobb, Wade & McNair by Hamlin L. Wade for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0648-01",
  "first_page_order": 672,
  "last_page_order": 673
}