{
  "id": 8554099,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CAROLYN STEVEY PROCTOR",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Proctor",
  "decision_date": "1972-11-22",
  "docket_number": "No. 727SC814",
  "first_page": "650",
  "last_page": "651",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "16 N.C. App. 650"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "187 S.E. 2d 741",
      "category": "reporters:state_regional",
      "reporter": "S.E.2d",
      "opinion_index": 0
    },
    {
      "cite": "281 N.C. 62",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "N.C.",
      "case_ids": [
        8573751
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/nc/281/0062-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 134,
    "char_count": 1547,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.20598227927574156
    },
    "sha256": "c2c35a9797c2c724d43710a6d2e6359dd71120fd5ec88e47bcce1800d43edc6e",
    "simhash": "1:5456c0483078128b",
    "word_count": 235
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:27:31.279819+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Hedrick and Graham concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CAROLYN STEVEY PROCTOR"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "VAUGHN, Judge.\nNo exceptions were entered at the trial before Judge Martin. Several days after the entry of judgment, defendant expressed a desire to appeal. Counsel for defendant, with appropriate candor, concedes that he is unable to discover or assign error but states that defendant now contends that the plea was not voluntarily and understandingly entered. The record contains the transcript of defendant\u2019s plea and the court\u2019s adjudication thereon. It clearly and affirmatively appears that the plea was voluntarily and understandingly entered. The court\u2019s adjudication thereon is supported by the evidence developed in open court and is affirmed. State v. Ford, 281 N.C. 62, 187 S.E. 2d 741.\nNo error.\nJudges Hedrick and Graham concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "VAUGHN, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by H. A. Cole, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for the State.",
      "Taylor, Brinson & Aycock by William W. Aycock, Jr. for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CAROLYN STEVEY PROCTOR\nNo. 727SC814\n(Filed 22 November 1972)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 25\u2014 plea of nolo contendere \u2014 showing of voluntariness in record\nThe record affirmatively shows that defendant\u2019s plea of nolo contendere to the crime of feloniously receiving stolen property was voluntarily and understandingly entered.\nAppeal by defendant from Martin (Perry), Judge, 7 August 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Edgecombe County.\nDefendant, represented by counsel, entered a plea of nolo contendere to the crime of feloniously receiving stolen property. Judgment was entered imposing an active prison sentence.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by H. A. Cole, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for the State.\nTaylor, Brinson & Aycock by William W. Aycock, Jr. for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0650-01",
  "first_page_order": 674,
  "last_page_order": 675
}