{
  "id": 8554558,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAY WISE BUTLER",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Butler",
  "decision_date": "1972-12-20",
  "docket_number": "No. 724SC610",
  "first_page": "167",
  "last_page": "168",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 N.C. App. 167"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1209,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "50488c1edaf4b21c2250fb7d7d2f8c803a5eb06633d0522cfbb57e9f45c8a339",
    "simhash": "1:8b0163a13212a032",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:57.402584+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Chief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAY WISE BUTLER"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BRITT, Judge.\nStating that he has carefully reviewed the record in this case but is unable to assign any error, defendant\u2019s court appointed counsel asks us to make a careful review and determine if there is error. Following a careful review of the entire record on appeal, we conclude that defendant received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and the sentence imposed is within the limits allowed by statute.\nNo error.\nChief Judge Mallard and Judge Brock concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BRITT, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Charles M. Hensey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.",
      "Bailey & Robinson by Edward G. Bailey for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAY WISE BUTLER\nNo. 724SC610\n(Filed 20 December 1972)\nAppeal by defendant from Rouse, Judge, 17 April 1972 Session, Onslow Superior Court.\nBy warrant proper in form defendant was charged with maintaining and operating \u201ca structure (home)\u201d for the purpose of prostitution and assignation, a violation of G.S. 14-204. From judgment imposed on a verdict of guilty in district court, defendant appealed to superior court where he was found guilty by a jury. From judgment in superior court imposing prison sentence of 18 to 24 months, defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Charles M. Hensey, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.\nBailey & Robinson by Edward G. Bailey for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0167-01",
  "first_page_order": 191,
  "last_page_order": 192
}