{
  "id": 8555567,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN McRAE SYKES",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Sykes",
  "decision_date": "1973-02-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 7319SC171",
  "first_page": "361",
  "last_page": "362",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 N.C. App. 361"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1578,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "d81069641764ea9a6d9c1c91907d8b4aaeee5b50a895ecbc21349088ebf85e96",
    "simhash": "1:fced86e5124d94eb",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:57.402584+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Britt and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN McRAE SYKES"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "PARKER, Judge.\nThe only exceptions and assignments of error are directed to denial of defendant\u2019s motions for dismissal and for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of the State\u2019s evidence and renewed at the close of all of the evidence. There was substantial evidence to support the jury\u2019s findings that defendant was guilty of all essential elements of the offenses charged. After careful review of the entire record we find\nNo error.\nJudges Britt and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "PARKER, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Howard A. Kramer for the State.",
      "Bell, Ogburn & Redding by Deane F. Bell for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOHN McRAE SYKES\nNo. 7319SC171\n(Filed 14 February 1973)\nAutomobiles \u00a7\u00a7 3, 127 \u2014 driving while license was revoked \u2014 drunken driving\u2014 sufficiency of evidence\nThe evidence was sufficient to support jury verdicts finding defendant guilty of driving while his license was permanently revoked and driving under the influence of intoxicants after he had been twice previously convicted of the same offense.\nAppeal by defendant from McConnell, Judge, 23 October 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Montgomery County.\nDefendant was charged with (1) driving a motor vehicle upon the highways of the State while his operator\u2019s license was permanently revoked and (2) driving a vehicle on the highways of the State while under the influence of intoxicating liquor after he had been twice previously convicted of the same offense. In each case the jury found him guilty as charged. From judgments imposing sentences, defendant appealed.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Associate Attorney Howard A. Kramer for the State.\nBell, Ogburn & Redding by Deane F. Bell for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0361-01",
  "first_page_order": 385,
  "last_page_order": 386
}