{
  "id": 8556399,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DORETHA THOMPSON",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Thompson",
  "decision_date": "1973-03-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 7316SC221",
  "first_page": "589",
  "last_page": "590",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 N.C. App. 589"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 2302,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "sha256": "96fedd8674a01e89d1c48a708b59b5cac137198898c0779f76f006bb2a19321e",
    "simhash": "1:9f225e0a4086c367",
    "word_count": 358
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:57.402584+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Morris and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DORETHA THOMPSON"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BRITT, Judge.\nA careful review of the record reveals no prejudicial error. The judgments appealed from are\nAffirmed.\nJudges Morris and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BRITT, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Robert Morgan by Richard B. Conely for the State.",
      "Musselwhite & Musselwhite by William E. Musselwhite for defendant appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DORETHA THOMPSON\nNo. 7316SC221\n(Filed 14 March 1973)\nCriminal Law \u00a7 143; Intoxicating Liquor \u00a7 5\u2014 illegal possession of whiskey \u2014 illegal possession of beer for sale \u2014 revocation of probation \u2014 no error\nThere was no prejudicial error in defendant\u2019s trial for illegal possession of whiskey and illegal possession of beer for the purpose of sale, nor was there error in a subsequent hearing in which defendant\u2019s probation was revoked and a prison sentence imposed.\nAppeals by defendant from judgments of McKinnon, Judge, entered at the 28 August 1972 and 16 October 1972 Sessions of Robeson Superior Court.\nBy warrant proper in form defendant was charged with (1) illegal possession of whiskey and (2) illegal possession of beer for purpose of sale. The offenses were allegedly committed on 12 May 1972. Defendant was found guilty in district court and from judgment imposed there, she appealed to superior court where she pleaded not guilty. Following the introduction of evidence by the State in superior court, defendant expressed her desire to change her plea to guilty. After due inquiry to determine if the guilty plea was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made, the court adjudged that it was, accepted the plea and entered judgment that defendant serve 12 months in prison. Defendant gave notice of appeal from said judgment which was entered on 7 September 1972.\nOn 22 September 1972, following a hearing, the District Court of Robeson County determined that defendant had wilfully violated the terms of a probation judgment entered on 24 January 1972; the court revoked defendant\u2019s probation and ordered the activation of a 12 months prison sentence. From the order revoking her probation, defendant appealed to superior court.\nOn 26 October 1972, following a hearing, Judge McKinnon entered judgment confirming the district court order revoking defendant\u2019s probation and ordered the prison sentence activated immediately. Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals.\nAttorney General Robert Morgan by Richard B. Conely for the State.\nMusselwhite & Musselwhite by William E. Musselwhite for defendant appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0589-01",
  "first_page_order": 613,
  "last_page_order": 614
}