{
  "id": 8556917,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY LEE DUNN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Dunn",
  "decision_date": "1973-03-28",
  "docket_number": "No. 7310SC70",
  "first_page": "728",
  "last_page": "729",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "17 N.C. App. 728"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 148,
    "char_count": 1674,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "sha256": "f05f8c66eb52b2830a98593c4268b805b600fc350587eb9f062c3708aea6b824",
    "simhash": "1:1fac7694071a282a",
    "word_count": 289
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:26:57.402584+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Hedrick and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY LEE DUNN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Judge.\nThe trial court was properly organized and had jurisdiction of the defendant and the subject matter. The bill of indictment was proper in form. Defendant was duly arraigned upon the charge of common law robbery and entered a plea of not guilty. The evidence was sufficient to be submitted to the jury, the verdict of the jury was proper in form, and the judgment was correctly entered. The sentence imposed does not exceed the maximum allowed by law.\nIn our opinion, defendant had a fair trial which was free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Hedrick and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan, by Associate Attorney Kramer, for the State.",
      "Charles H. Yarborough, Jr., for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HARRY LEE DUNN\nNo. 7310SC70\n(Filed 28 March 1973)\nRobbery \u00a7 4\u2014 common law robbery \u2014 no error in trial\nDefendant in a common law robbery case had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.\nAppeal by defendant from Canaday, Judge, 10 July 1972 Session of Superior Court held in Wake County.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment with common law robbery. The evidence for the State tended to show the following: On 7 May 1972, between ten and eleven o\u2019clock p.m., defendant went into the Kwik-Pik store on the old Garner Road. He demanded of the cashier that she \u201c[t]ake the money out of the cash register.\u201d Defendant had one hand in his pocket and the cashier heard a \u201cclick.\u201d She gave defendant the money because she was afraid and she thought she was protecting her life. The cashier had seen defendant before and identified him as the perpetrator of the robbery.\nThe jury found defendant guilty of common law robbery. He appealed.\nAttorney General Morgan, by Associate Attorney Kramer, for the State.\nCharles H. Yarborough, Jr., for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0728-01",
  "first_page_order": 752,
  "last_page_order": 753
}