{
  "id": 8549721,
  "name": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RANDOLPH WIDEMAN",
  "name_abbreviation": "State v. Wideman",
  "decision_date": "1973-05-23",
  "docket_number": "No. 7318SC225",
  "first_page": "347",
  "last_page": "348",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "18 N.C. App. 347"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "N.C. Ct. App.",
    "id": 14983,
    "name": "North Carolina Court of Appeals"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 5,
    "name_long": "North Carolina",
    "name": "N.C."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1564,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.503,
    "sha256": "b73f238ece51fad23772fc80086b619d0dc6ac8f41393985780bd20d1f21c102",
    "simhash": "1:4684e0c8f1bac843",
    "word_count": 259
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:14:36.293491+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [
      "Judges Mor\u00e9is and Vaughn concur."
    ],
    "parties": [
      "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RANDOLPH WIDEMAN"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "BROCK, Judge.\nThe bill of indictment is proper in form and sufficient to charge the defendant with the offense of armed robbery. The jury rendered in open court a verdict of guilty of the offense of armed robbery and the sentence imposed is within the limits allowed by statute. In our opinion defendant received a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.\nNo error.\nJudges Mor\u00e9is and Vaughn concur.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "BROCK, Judge."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Attorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Ricks, for the State.",
      "Bob Scott, attorney for the defendant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RANDOLPH WIDEMAN\nNo. 7318SC225\n(Filed 23 May 1973)\nAppeal by defendant from Exum, Judge, 23 October 1972 Session of Superior Court held in GUILFORD County.\nDefendant was charged in a bill of indictment with the felony of armed robbery.\nThe State\u2019s evidence through the testimony of the victim and through the testimony of the alleged accomplice of defendant tended to show the following: On 24 April 1972, between 7:30 and 8:00 p.m., defendant and his accomplice went to the victim\u2019s service station as victim was preparing to close for the evening. When the victim stepped inside the men\u2019s bathroom to clean up, defendant followed him, threw one arm around the victim\u2019s neck, and held a gun on the victim with the other hand. Defendant then took the victim\u2019s pocketbook containing $36.00.\nDefendant testified that he was elsewhere at the time of the robbery; that he knew nothing about the robbery; and that the alleged accomplice was trying to implicate him because he (the alleged accomplice) was angry with defendant.\nAttorney General Morgan, by Assistant Attorney General Ricks, for the State.\nBob Scott, attorney for the defendant."
  },
  "file_name": "0347-01",
  "first_page_order": 371,
  "last_page_order": 372
}